How Schools Teach our Children to be Fat

A beautiful view of the mountains in Canmore, Alberta. (Dr. Noorali Bharwani)
A beautiful view of the mountains in Canmore, Alberta. (Dr. Noorali Bharwani)

“Our children are getting fatter. They eat more and move less,” says Diane Kelsall, MD, deputy editor, Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ April 7, 2015), in an editorial titled, “How schools teach our children to be fat.”

The editorial goes on to say that nearly 85 per cent of children aged three to four years meet activity levels recommended in Canadian guidelines, but this falls to only four per cent in teens.

Unfortunately, most of our overweight or obese children will not outgrow their weight problem. That means they develop adult diseases like hypertension and diabetes. And our schools hinder the fight against obesity in our youth, says the editorial.

If you look at a typical day for our children when they are at school then you will understand why Dr. Kelsall feels our schools are doing a poor job of preventing obesity. She makes the following points:

  • Our children’s school day starts early, often well before 9 am.
  • They are likely driven or take the bus to school.
  • They are tired when they arrive and sit for most of the day.
  • Physical education classes are usually not required after grade nine.
  • Lunch may be rushed, and food options available in the school may be high in fat or sugar.
  • At lunch or after classes, some students may participate in sports, but most don’t.
  • Students have hours of homework resulting in extended screen time.
  • They go to bed late, and the cycle starts all over again.

No wonder nearly one-third of our school-aged children are overweight or obese. Our schools should be helping our children to be healthy and that should lead to healthy adulthood. How can schools do that? Dr. Kelsall suggests the following:

  • Daily exercise should be mandatory for all school children. It should become part of daily life. Classes should include enough sustained, vigorous exercise to help students meet recommended activity levels, rather than the 20-minute requirement in some jurisdictions.
  • Walking or cycling to school is a good start.
  • Taking public transportation affords more opportunity for exercise than being driven by parents.

Lengthy sitting time has been shown to be a risk factor for early death in adults. The editorial says that a peek into most high school classrooms will show rows of students sitting for classes that are often 75 minutes in length, among the longest in the world. This sends the message that being sedentary is acceptable. Beyond physical education classes, getting students moving during school hours takes creativity.

We should do what Japan does. Make food education a part of the compulsory curriculum. We should encourage our kids to sleep early and get up early. Like adults, tired adolescents are at increased risk of obesity.

“Obesity is a complex disease and prevention requires multilevel intervention,” says Dr. Kelsall. It starts with the individual and family making good choices around exercise and food intake, but broader societal support is necessary. Our battle against smoking is slowly winning and message to people is clear – if you smoke then you kill yourself and hurt others. The message for obesity and overeating is the same – stop hurting yourself and the people you love.

Start reading the preview of my book A Doctor's Journey for free on Amazon. Available on Kindle for $2.99!

Saying the Last Good-Bye to an Inspiring Friend I Never Met

Candles - Peace for Joyce. (Dr. Noorali Bharwani)
Candles - Peace for Joyce. (Dr. Noorali Bharwani)

I have been writing articles on a random basis since my school days. But my serious writing started in Medicine Hat. I also started taking a writing course inspired by a friend I never met, Joyce. Joyce is a successful writer.

Due to various reasons, I never finished the writing course but Joyce received my columns on a regular basis. From time to time she would write to me encouraging and inspiring letters. She lived in British Columbia. Once I was there on a holiday with my family. I arranged to meet with Joyce. The meeting was cancelled at the last minute, as I was running late in my other commitment. Now I feel so bad that I never got to meet Joyce.

In the last few months, Joyce has been sharing with me her health issues, which are not very good. I think about her and pray for her health and comfort. You wonder sometimes why such good people have to suffer so much at the end of the their wonderful and satisfying life. I saw my mother suffer from the consequences of cancer in her dying days. As a physician I know what Joyce is going through.

Her last email to me arrived few weeks ago. I will share that with the readers of my column because many will empathise with what Joyce has to say. Her email reads as follows:

Hello Doctor,

I’m shutting down my computer in a few days, so I wanted to bring you up-to-date.  I think I told you I have lymphoma.  They radiated the tumour and I went into remission.

About three months ago, I came up with a tumour in the colon, unrelated to the lymphoma. Last week they sent me for a scope and couldn’t even get it in the colon.  As far as they can tell, my large colon is almost solid with cancer.  It is fast growing and metastasizing. I’ve decided not to do anything.

I’m almost 80, have had 39 surgeries, 2 heart attacks, been hit by lightning twice, Don is gone and I’ve had over 40 years of pain. It all started when I got that heart virus.  To be honest, I’m tired and can’t fight anymore.  My kidney function is approaching dialysis so it’s unlikely I’d survive removing my entire large bowel.

The oncologist said I’m not going to feel much worse until the bowel completely closes and perforates.  From then it’s right to hospice and it will go quickly.  He said they’d likely put me in a coma the first day or two. Until then, it’s life, as we know it.

I’ve done everything I’ve wanted to, have made all my amends and have left a legacy of which I’m proud.  It’s been difficult for my family and some of my friends, but everyone is starting to settle down.  I have no fear and am actually anxious to start the next adventure.

I’m very proud of you and what you’ve done with your talent.  It’s been fun for me to watch you grow and to read your columns.  Thanks for taking the time to send them to me.  I wish you all the luck as you go forward with your writing.  The blessing is, it is something you can do no matter where life takes you.  You’ve been an inspiration in my life.  Thank you!

Joyce

Well, what can I say Joyce. You have inspired me and many of your students. So good-bye Joyce, may you find peace and comfort where ever you go in the world beyond this planet. May your soul rest in eternal peace… Amen.

Start reading the preview of my book A Doctor's Journey for free on Amazon. Available on Kindle for $2.99!

Screening with Pap Test Should Not be Ignored

Barbuda - time to relax on a beach. (Dr. Noorali Bharwani)
Barbuda - time to relax on a beach. (Dr. Noorali Bharwani)

“The rate of death from cervical cancer is reduced by more than 80 per cent among women who have regular Papanicolaou (Pap) screening,” says an article in the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ December 9, 2014).

Every woman knows or should know the importance of regular Pap smear test. Since World War II, the test has been the most widely used and successful cancer screening technique in history. It is named after the Greek doctor who invented it – Dr. George Nicholas Papanicolaou.

Since the Pap smear was introduced in 1940s, deaths from invasive cervical cancer occur mostly among women who do not undergo regular screening. It is sad to note that women of lower socioeconomic status and those who are older, First Nations or immigrants are less likely to be screened regularly.

The article notes that screening intervals shorter than three years increase the risk of finding and investigating abnormalities that mostly resolve spontaneously. So it is unnecessary to do Pap smear more often than every three years. The drawback is that longer intervals require organized screening and recall programs to maintain high participation rates. This is not always easy.

At what age should we start doing Pap smear? This varies by jurisdiction, but most guidelines agree that harm from false-positive results outweighs potential benefits of Pap screening in young women. Women who have had a total hysterectomy for a benign disorder and women over 70 years of age who have had three normal test results within 10 years do not require Pap screening, says the article.

Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations on Pap screening are as follows:
1. Don’t use the Pap test for screening in women who are under 21 or more than 69 years of age (Screening should stop at age 70 if the results of three previous tests were normal).
2. Don’t do Pap screening annually in women with previously normal results.
3. Don’t do Pap tests in women who have had a full hysterectomy for a benign disorder.

How can we prevent cervical cancer by testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection? The answer to this question is not clear yet. It is work in progress. It is important to remember that HPV is a cancer-causing virus. We know infection with specific strains of HPV is a necessary precursor to cervical cancer. HPV types 16 and 18 are present in about 70 per cent of cervical cancers worldwide and are targeted in HPV vaccines. Some of the viruses cause genital warts – another sexually transmitted infection.

Who is susceptible to HPV infection? A woman who is sexually active, she has multiple partners or she has sexually transmitted infection. Then there would be an indication to do HPV test. The reason HPV test is not recommended for all women is because there is not yet sufficient data on its effect on mortality and incidence of invasive cervical cancer.

Start reading the preview of my book A Doctor's Journey for free on Amazon. Available on Kindle for $2.99!

CT Scan versus MRI Scan – Which is Better?

A boat waiting to sail off the coast of Antigua. (Dr. Noorali Bharwani)
A boat waiting to sail off the coast of Antigua. (Dr. Noorali Bharwani)

It is hard to think that there is any adult who hasn’t had either magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) or both. They are complementary imaging technologies and each has advantages and limitations for particular indications.

CT is more widely used than MRI in some countries. That raises concern about the potential for CT to contribute to radiation-induced cancer. In 2007, it was estimated that 0.4 per cent of current cancers in the United States were due to CTs performed in the past. It is also estimated that in the future this figure may rise to two per cent based on historical rates of CT usage.

CT scans have many benefits that outweigh this small potential risk. Newer, faster machines and techniques require less radiation than was previously used. Still, CT is contraindicated in pregnancy.

Compare that to MRI. An advantage of MRI is that no ionizing radiation is used. MRI is recommended over CT when either approach could yield the same diagnostic information. Unfortunately, there are not many common imaging scenarios in which MRI can simply replace CT.

Although MRI can detect health problems or confirm a diagnosis, it is interesting to note that medical societies often recommend that MRI not be the first procedure for diagnosis and treatment.

CT images provide more detailed information. A CT scan combines a series of X-ray images taken from different angles and uses computer processing to create cross-sectional images, or slices, of the bones, blood vessels and soft tissues inside a body.

A CT is well suited to quickly examine people who may have internal injuries from car accidents or other types of trauma. A CT scan can be used to visualize nearly all parts of the body and is used to diagnose disease or injury as well as to plan medical, surgical or radiation treatment.

MRI scanners use magnetic fields and radio waves to form images of the body. The technique is widely used in hospitals for medical diagnosis, staging of disease and for follow-up without exposure to ionizing radiation. In certain cases MRI is not preferred as it can be more expensive, time-consuming, and claustrophobic.

To summarize, indications of doing CT scan and MRI scan are pretty similar. There is a small radiation exposure in CT compared to none in MRI. CT is slightly cheaper to do. It takes less time than MRI, especially beneficial for claustrophobic patients and time utilization in the radiology department. If you are claustrophobic then ask for a mild sedation and enjoy the ride.

Start reading the preview of my book A Doctor's Journey for free on Amazon. Available on Kindle for $2.99!